- Advertisment -

Follow Us:

- Advertisment -

Logic, Fairness, and the Anti-Calvinist



We need your support. As big tech continues its crackdown on conservative blogs, our days on these platforms are numbered. Please subscribe to our mailing list so that we can continue to stay in touch with you. Please also consider a paid subscription for ad-free content delivered directly to you. Paid subscribers will also receive the additional benefit of strong and controversial religious and political opinion and argumentation.

When I run into someone who wants to rail against the doctrine of election – something which happens frequently – he usually takes one of two approaches, one of which is to argue that it is unfair to discriminate, and the other is to invent a caricature that it means that God refuses salvation to someone who wants it. The caricature is refuted simply by its supposition of an impossibility (John 6:44).

In response to the first, I don’t believe that anyone holds such a blatantly humanistic attitude. After all, I don’t know of any serious Christian who holds that “fairness” is a biblical value. Besides which, the Scriptures contain an explicit answer to that very argument:

What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! For He says to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.’ So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy…  So then He has mercy on whomever He wills, and he hardens whomever He wills. You will say to me then, ‘Why does He still find fault? For who can resist His will?’ But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, ‘Why have you made me like this?’ Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use? –(Romans 9:14-16, 18-21).

Paul tells us that God acts according to His sovereign will. In response, he describes a hypothetical opponent who complains that God is unfair in then judging the sinner to whom God chooses not to extend mercy. Without even giving that argument credence, Paul answers that God, as Creator, has the right to treat His creatures as satisfies Him, not us. 

I think the real problem is that the opponent of Calvinism doesn’t really believe that men deserve judgment to Hell. He will say it under other circumstances, that the unbeliever will go to Hell if he fails to repent. But, at the same time, he secretly believes that the unbeliever deserves to be given repentance, whether he wants it or not.

The answer is not found just in Scripture, but also in reason.

“Out of this race of guilty and polluted sinners, thus justly condemned, God graciously and eternally elected some to life and happiness and glory, while He left the rest in their state of wretchedness and ruin, and determined to inflict upon them the punishment which they justly deserved. The reason why He elected some and passed by others when all were equally undeserving, is to be referred wholly to Himself – to the counsel of His own will or to His mere good pleasure” (James Henley Thornwell, “Election and Reprobation,” emphasis mine).

By the way, did you know Reformation Charlotte has a Christian gear and apparel store? Check it out at ReformedGear.com.

Thornwell gives the right answer here. It is true that election is not fair. But fairness would send Clavinistall of the wicked, that is, every member of the human race, to Hell as his deserved judgment. That is really what the anti-Calvinist seeks with his argument. Not that he would admit it, of course. But logically, the conclusion is unavoidable.


You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

We are being actively censored on many platforms because of our conservative views. The more places you follow us, the more likely we are to get our message out. Please support us by following us on Facebook, following us on Twitter, following us on Parler, following us on Instagram, and visiting our gear and apparel store. Also, please subscribe to our newsletter. If you would like to support us financially, a contribution of any amount is greatly appreciated.

Html code here! Replace this with any non empty raw html code and that's it.
- Advertisement -

Latest news

Gallery of the Sick and Twisted Pro-Abortion Lobby on the Day of the Supreme Court Abortion Case

Below is a gallery of some of the pro-abortion lobby around the nation today as the most important abortion...

David Platt Continues to Tank as He Joins Rank Heretics for Another Conference in 2022

Earlier this month, Reformation Charlotte reported that David Platt, pastor of the once-thriving-but-now-failing because of his obsession with race...

Amid Gay Preaching Scandal, Former SBC President Resigns From Seminary Post

Reformation Charlotte broke the story last week of James Merritt who endorsed the preaching of his openly homosexual son,...

False Teacher of the Day #45: Sean Feucht

Making number 45 on our False Teacher of the Day Series is Sean Feucht. Feucht was a worship leader--part...
- Advertisement -

Former SBC President Accused of Assault, Racist Jokes, by Former Staff Member

Former Southern Baptist president, James Merritt--who made headlines last week after he recommended the preaching of an open homosexual...

The Gospel Coalition “Updates” Their Slanderous Article Against Rittenhouse Without Apology

Last year, The Gospel Coalition published an article referring to Kyle Rittenhouse as a "mass shooter" and compared him...

Must read

Preparing Your Children for the Next Sexual Revolution

Societies have seen sexual revolutions repeatedly all throughout history....
- Advertisement -